Scarpinato v. Indiana State Prison et al
Plaintiff: Daniel L Scarpinato
Defendant: Indiana State Prison, Anthony Watson, S Hough and Ms Smith
Case Number: 3:2015cv00509
Filed: October 29, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: South Bend Office
County: LaPorte
Presiding Judge: William C Lee
Presiding Judge: Christopher A Nuechterlein
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 38 OPINION AND ORDER taking under advisement 27 Motion for Summary Judgment pending receipt of supplemental information from the plaintiff. Scarpinato is DIRECTED to submit a sworn declaration or affidavit as outlined in the order no later than 7/24/ 2017. In addition, the defendants are GRANTED leave until 8/11/17 to respond to any filing by the plaintiff. Finally, Scarpinato is CAUTIONED that failure to provide the information outlined above may result in the summary judgment motion being granted without further notice. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 7/6/17. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nal)
September 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 17 OPINION AND ORDER: Grants the plaintiff leave to proceed against Anthony Watson and S. Hough in their individual capacities for money damages for failing to provide him with adequate bedding in violation of the Eighth Amendment; Dismisses any and all other claims contained in the complaint; Directs the Clerk and the US Marshals Service to issue and serve process on Anthony Watson and S. Hough with a copy of this order and the second amended complaint; Order that Anthony Watson and S. Hough respond only to the claims for which the plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in this screening order. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 9/12/2016. (cc: Watson, Hough, Scarpinato)(lpw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scarpinato v. Indiana State Prison et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel L Scarpinato
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Indiana State Prison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anthony Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S Hough
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ms Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?