Barrington Music Products Inc v. Guitar Center Stores, Inc. et al
Barrington Music Products Inc |
Guitar Center Stores, Inc., Music & Arts Centers, Eastman Music Company and Woodwind and Brasswind Inc The |
3:2016cv00006 |
January 7, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
South Bend Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Christopher A Nuechterlein |
Robert L Miller |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 144 OPINION AND ORDER The court DENIES Barrington Music Products, Inc.'s 137 motion to amend the judgment. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 8/6/18. (kjp) |
Filing 116 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The court directs counsel to submit a revised proposed pretrial order forthwith. The court GRANTS Barrington's 99 Request for Judicial Notice of the Vento marks' ownership and validity; DENIES Barrington 039;s 115 MOTION for Oral Argument; and OVERRULES, as a pretrial matter, 107 Barrington's objections to defendants' rebuttal expert Joshua Lathrop and Dr. Jeffrey Stec's expert testimony. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 5/10/18. (jld) |
Filing 76 OPINION AND ORDER denying 72 Motion for Reconsideration of 50 order denying defendants'summary judgment motion. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 2/28/18. (kjp) |
Filing 63 OPINION AND ORDER: The Court DENIES the defendants' 50 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 10/17/2017. (jss) (cc: pro se party) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.