Phifer v. Indiana Department of Correction et al
| Charles Phifer |
| Kathy Griffin and Corizon |
| 3:2016cv00106 |
| February 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| South Bend Office |
| Miami |
| Christopher A Nuechterlein |
| Philip P Simon |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 56 Summary Judgment, 55 MOTION Plaintiff request a ruling To his 8/25/16 reply, deposing Drfendents to perjury To True Test Results of Life Thrating Medical Conditions, as raised below re 50 Response/Reply filed by Charles Phifer. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 10/4/16. (cc: Charles Phifer) (ksp)
|
|
Filing
52
OPINION AND ORDER: This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for nonpayment of the filing fee and CLOSED. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 9/22/2016. cc: Phifer (tc)
|
|
Filing
22
OPINION AND ORDER The court takes the in forma pauperis petition DE 7 under advisement and GRANTS Charles Phifer until July 7, 2016, to file an amended complaint explaining how and why he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury and naming the defendant responsible to provide him with medical treatment that is refusing to do so. He is CAUTIONED that if he does not respond by that deadline, he will be denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 6/1/16. cc:pltf(kjp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
