Irby v. Neal et al
Freeman Irby |
Ron Neal, Sue Whelm, C Bass and Bruce Lemmon |
3:2016cv00222 |
April 11, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
South Bend Office |
LaPorte |
Christopher A Nuechterlein |
Philip P Simon |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 OPINION AND ORDER re 14 Amended Complaint Irby is GRANTED leave to proceed on an Eighth Amendment claim for money damages against Whelm in her individual capacity for denying Irby adequate medical care by failing to properly preserve his severed fingertip on September 11, 2015; all other claims are DISMISSED, and Corizon, Neal, and Bass areDISMISSED as defendants; the Clerk and the United States Marshals Service are DIRECTED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), to issue and serve process on Whelm; and Whelm is ORDERED, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), to respond, as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 10.1, only to the claim for which Irby has been granted leave to proceed. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 05/30/2017. (Copy mailed as directed in Order)(lpw) |
Filing 10 OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff is GRANTED until 1/9/2017 to file an amended complaint and is CAUTIONED that failure to file an amended complaint by that date will result in dismissal of this case without further notice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 12/5/16. (jld) (cc: Irby) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.