Cunningham v. Keefer

Cunningham v. Keefer

Plaintiff:	Travis Scott Cunningham
Defendant:	Lonnie Keefer
Case Number:	3:2016cv00453
Filed:	July 11, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office:	South Bend Office
County:	LaPorte
Presiding Judge:	Christopher A Nuechterlein
Presiding Judge:	Philip P Simon
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 18, 2016	Filing 6 OPINION AND ORDER: DENYING 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; this cause of action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Travis Scott Cunningham, IDOC # 156774, is ORDERED to pay (and the facility having custody of him to automatically re mit) to the clerk of this court 20% of the money he receives for each calendar month during which he receives $10.00 or more, until the $400.00 filing fee is paid in full; the clerk of court is DIRECTED to return, unfiled, any papers filed in any case by or on behalf of Travis Scott Cunningham (except for a notice of appeal or unless filed in a criminal or habeas corpus proceeding) until he has paid in full all outstanding fees and sanctions in all civil actions in any federal court; the clerk is ORDERED to note any attempted filings in violation of this order on the docket of Case No. 3:16-cv-477; and the clerk is DIRECTED to ensure that a copy of this order is mailed to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 8/18/2016. (lhc)(cc: Plaintiff and Westville Correctional Facility)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 18, 2016

Filing 6 OPINION AND ORDER: DENYING 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; this cause of action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Travis Scott Cunningham, IDOC # 156774, is ORDERED to pay (and the facility having custody of him to automatically re mit) to the clerk of this court 20% of the money he receives for each calendar month during which he receives $10.00 or more, until the $400.00 filing fee is paid in full; the clerk of court is DIRECTED to return, unfiled, any papers filed in any case by or on behalf of Travis Scott Cunningham (except for a notice of appeal or unless filed in a criminal or habeas corpus proceeding) until he has paid in full all outstanding fees and sanctions in all civil actions in any federal court; the clerk is ORDERED to note any attempted filings in violation of this order on the docket of Case No. 3:16-cv-477; and the clerk is DIRECTED to ensure that a copy of this order is mailed to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 8/18/2016. (lhc)(cc: Plaintiff and Westville Correctional Facility)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cunningham v. Keefer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Travis Scott Cunningham
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Lonnie Keefer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?