Neurology and Pain Management Associates P.C. v. Bunin et al
| Neurology And Pain Management Associates, P.C. |
| Anthony Bunin and Bio-Behavioral Care Solutions, LLC |
| Anthony Bunin |
| Neurology And Pain Management Associates, P.C. |
| 3:2017cv00035 |
| January 12, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| South Bend Office |
| St. Joseph |
| Joseph S Van Bokkelen |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
187
OPINION AND ORDER: The court GRANTS Vanguard and Dr. Posar's motion in limine as to the issue of damages evidence only (all other issues being moot) 172 , DISMISSES BCS's promissory estoppel claim without prejudice for lack of standing, DE NIES AS MOOT BCS's motion in limine 159 , BCS's motion to supplement 168 , and Dr. Bunin's motion in limine 162 . The court ORDERS Dr. Bunin and Vanguard to file their dismissal papers by May 3, 2024. The court VACATES the April 16, 2024 trial date. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 4/3/24. (dnj)
|
|
Filing
158
OPINION AND ORDER: The court DENIES the motion to reconsider the summary judgment ruling 151 as outlined. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 2/8/2024. (mrm)
|
|
Filing
141
OPINION AND ORDER: As outlined in order, the Court DISMISSES BCS claim for fraudulent inducement in Count VI of its Amended Complaint 85 . Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 04/12/2023. (sej)
|
|
Filing
112
OPINION AND ORDER: Dr. Bunin's and BCS's Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Court GRANTS Dr. Bunin's Motion for Summary Judgment on Count I (Breach of Contract) and notes that Dr. Bunin's coun terclaim for breach of contract is now dismissed. These counts are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court GRANTS Dr. Bunin's Motion for Summary Judgment on Count II (Constructive Fraud), Count III (Breach of Fiduciary Duty), and Count V (Tortious I nterference). These counts are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court DENIES Dr. Bunin's Motion for Summary Judgment on Count IV (Fraud) and Count VI (Unfair Competition). The Court GRANTS BCS's Motion for Summary Judgment on Count II, Count V , the tortious interference with a contractual relationship claim, and Count VI. These counts are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Vanguard's motion for summary judgment is also GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Court DENIES Vanguard's Motio n for Summary Judgment on Count I (Breach of Contract), Count VI (Fraud in the Inducement), and Count VII (Promissory Estoppel). The Court GRANTS Vanguard's Motion for Summary Judgment on Count II (Unjust Enrichment), Count III (Tortious Interfe rence with a Contractual Relationship), Count IV (Tortious Interference with a Contractual Relationship), and Count V (Tortious Interference with a Business Relationship). These counts are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 1/22/2021. (bas)
|
|
Filing
63
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 50 Joint MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Anthony Bunin, Bio-Behavioral Care Solutions, LLC.. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 8/13/18. (kjp)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER ON 21 MOTION TO REMAND AND 16 MOTION TO TRANSFER. The Court DENIES Vanguard's Motion to Remand and GRANTS in part and DENIES in part BCS's Motion to Transfer. For the reasons stated herein, this action is hereby TRANSFERED to the Northern District of Indiana. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 1/09/2017. (LDH) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 1/12/2017.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
