Johnson v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
Plaintiff: Dedrick Johnson
Defendant: Indiana Department of Corrections, Lt Watson, Lt Dykstra and M Smith
Case Number: 3:2017cv00071
Filed: January 23, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: South Bend Office
County: LaPorte
Presiding Judge: Rudy Lozano
Presiding Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 33 OPINION AND ORDER: The defendants are ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE by 3/2/2018, as to why the motion for summary judgment on the exhaustion defense should not be denied by addressing the return form attached to the amended complaint and explaining how it re lates to the exhaustion defense. Dedrick Johnson is GRANTED until 3/30/2018, to reply to the defendants' show cause response, and the defendants are CAUTIONED that failure to show cause by 3/2/2018 will result in the denial of the motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 2/8/2018. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(jss)
June 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 10 OPINION AND ORDER re 8 ; Johnson is GRANTED leave to proceed against Dykstra and Watson in their individual capacities for money damages for failing to provide him with adequate conditions of confinement on May 26, 2016, through May 31, 2016, in v iolation of the Eighth Amendment;any and all other claims contained in the complaint are DISMISSED; the Clerk of Court and the United States Marshals Service are DIRECTED to issue and serve a copy of this order and the amended complaint on Dykstra an d Watson; and pursuant to Dykstra and Watson are ORDERED to respond only to the claims for which the plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in this screening order. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 6/21/2017. (Copy mailed as directed in Order)(lpw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dedrick Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Indiana Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lt Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lt Dykstra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?