Smith v. Indiana Department of Correction et al
Virgil Justin Smith |
Indiana Department of Correction, Corizon Medical Services, Bruce Lemmon, Ron Neal, Reinaldo Matias PHD, Jennifer Harmon-Nary PsyD and Andrew K Manning LMHC |
3:2017cv00077 |
January 26, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
South Bend Office |
LaPorte |
John E Martin |
Rudy Lozano |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 OPINION AND ORDER re 1 Pro Se Complaint, the Court: (1) GRANTS VirgilJustin Smith, leave to proceed on an Eighth Amendment claim forcompensatory damages against Andrew K. Manning, LMHC, in hisindividual capacity for denying Smith mental health tre atment bychanging Smiths Mental Status Classification on March 6, 2016, toindicate that Smith was Free of mental illness which caused Smithto attempt suicide on April 9, 2016; (2) DISMISSES all otherclaims; (3) DISMISSES Indiana Department of Correct ion, CorizonMedical Services, Bruce Lemmon, Ron Neal, Reinaldo Matias PHD, andJennifer Harmon-Nary PsyD; (4) DIRECTS the Clerk and the UnitedStates Marshals Service to issue and serve process on Andrew K.Manning, LMHC, with a copy of this order and the complaint and (5) ORDERS, that Andrew K. Manning, LMHC, respond only to the claim for which the plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in this screening order. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano. (Copy mailed as directed in Order)(lpw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.