Hollowell v. Postle Extrusion

Hollowell v. Postle Extrusion

Plaintiff:	Terrance Hollowell
Defendant:	Postle Extrusion
Case Number:	3:2017cv00207
Filed:	March 10, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office:	South Bend Office
County:	Elkhart
Presiding Judge:	Joseph S Van Bokkelen
Presiding Judge:	Michael G Gotsch
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 6, 2017	Filing 23 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 10 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Postle Extrusion. The Motion is GRANTED IN PART with respect to the Complaint's claims under 42 U.S.C. §1982, §1983 and the Equal Protection Cla use, for hate crimes under 18 U.S.C. §245, and for wrongful termination under Indiana law. Otherwise, the Motion is DENIED IN PART. The case will continue on the basis of Plaintiff Terrance Howard's claims of race discrimination (including hostile environment), age discrimination and retaliation, brought under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §1981 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 7/6/17. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (cer)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 6, 2017

Filing 23 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 10 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Postle Extrusion. The Motion is GRANTED IN PART with respect to the Complaint's claims under 42 U.S.C. §1982, §1983 and the Equal Protection Cla use, for hate crimes under 18 U.S.C. §245, and for wrongful termination under Indiana law. Otherwise, the Motion is DENIED IN PART. The case will continue on the basis of Plaintiff Terrance Howard's claims of race discrimination (including hostile environment), age discrimination and retaliation, brought under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §1981 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 7/6/17. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (cer)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hollowell v. Postle Extrusion
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terrance Hollowell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Postle Extrusion
Represented By:	Brett R Hummer
Represented By:	T Michael Pangburn
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?