Bardlette v. Redden
Mario T Bardlette |
Sgt Redden |
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only) |
3:2017cv00290 |
April 19, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
South Bend Office |
Wabash |
Philip P Simon |
Michael G Gotsch |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 18 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING 23 Motion for Summary Judgment. Within fourteen (14) days of this order, the Defendant is ORDERED to file a notice advising whether he elects to withdraw his exhaustion defense o r proceed with a hearing pursuant to Pavey v. Conley, 544 F.3d 739 (7th Cir. 2008). If a hearing is necessary, this matter will be referred to the Magistrate Judge for the purpose of holding the hearing. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 5/30/18. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mlc) |
Filing 7 OPINION AND ORDER re [6 Amended Complaint; Bardlette is GRANTED leave to proceed against Sgt. Redden in his individual capacity for monetary damages for using excessive force against him on April 22, 2016; all other claims are DISMISSED; the clerk an d the U S. Marshals Service are DIRECTED to issue and serve process on Sgt. Redden with a copy of this order and the amended complaint; and Sgt. Redden is ORDERED to respond only to the claim for which the pro se plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in this screening order. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 8/21/2017. (Copy mailed as directed in Order)(lpw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.