Taghon v. Lawson et al
| Stephen Edward Taghon, Jr |
| Julie Lawson, S Richmond and Miss Coleman |
| 3:2017cv00508 |
| June 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| South Bend Office |
| St. Joseph |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
OPINION AND ORDER re 1 Pro Se Complaint, the court: GRANTS Stephen Edward Taghon, Jr., leave to proceed against Julie Lawson, S. Richmond, and Miss Coleman in their individual capacities for compensatory and punitive damages for impeding his abi lity to post bail in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment; GRANTS Stephen Edward Taghon, Jr., leave to proceed against Julie Lawson, S. Richmond, and Miss Coleman in their official capacities for injunctive relief requiring them to notarize his powe r of attorney without prepayment of the $3.00 notary fee; DISMISSES all other claims; DIRECTS the clerk and the U. S Marshal Service to issue and serve process on Julie Lawson, S. Richmond, and Miss Coleman with a copy of this order and the co mplaint and ORDERS Julie Lawson, S. Richmond, and Miss Coleman to respond only to the claim for which the plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in this screening order. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 8/14/2017. (Copy mailed as directed in Order)(lpw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
