Napier v. Louis Dreyfus Corporation
Plaintiff: Ken Napier
Defendant: Louis Dreyfus Company LDAI Holdings LLC
Case Number: 3:2017cv00535
Filed: July 10, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: South Bend Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Philip P Simon
Presiding Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 43 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 26 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 10/15/18. (ksp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Napier v. Louis Dreyfus Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ken Napier
Represented By: Daniel H Pfeifer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Louis Dreyfus Company LDAI Holdings LLC
Represented By: Codie J Ross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?