Futch v. Doctor, Nurses John and Jane Doe et al
Plaintiff: Kenny L Futch
Defendant: Doctor, Nurses John and Jane Doe, Officer Gray and J Scaife
Case Number: 3:2017cv00753
Filed: October 3, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: South Bend Office
County: Miami
Presiding Judge: Philip P Simon
Presiding Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 54 OPINION AND ORDER granting 47 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court DISMISSES Noe Marandet, Timothy Neff, Pamela Smyth, Lynn Cadena, and Shalana Seifert. The Court NOTES that the case remains pending against Officer Christopher Gray. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 11/16/18. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nal)
August 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 35 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 33 MOTION to Amend/Correct 20 Amended Complaint filed by Kenny L Futch. Party T Neff, P Smyth, L Cadema and S Seifeit added. DIRECTS the clerk to file the amended complaint (ECF 33-1);GRANTS Kenny L. Futch leav e to proceed on a claim against Dr. Marandet,Officer Gray, T. Neff, P. Smyth, L. Cadema, and S. Seifeit in their individual capacities for money damages for acting with deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment by denying him pain medication and other medical supplies; GRANTS Kenny L. Futch leave to proceed on a claim against Officer Gray in his individual capacity for money damages for violating the Equal Protection Clause by discriminating again st Futch on the basis of his financial status with respect to his property;GRANTS Kenny L. Futch leave to proceed on a claim against Officer Gray inhis individual capacity for money damages for retaliating against Futch in violation of the First Amen dment by confiscating his property; DISMISSES J. Scaife; DISMISSES all other claims; DIRECTS the clerk and the United States Marshals Service to issue and serve process on T. Neff, P. Smyth, L. Cadema, and S. Seifeit at the Indiana Department of Corr ection with a copy of this order and the amended complaint (ECF 33-1) as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d); and ORDERS Dr. Marandet, Officer Gray, T. Neff, P. Smyth, L. Cadema, and S.Seifeit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), to respond as provided in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and N.D. Ind. L.R. 10.1, only to the claims for which Kenny L. Futch has been granted leave to proceed in this screening order. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 8/14/18. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mlc)
May 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS Kenny L. Futch's motion to amend the complaint 17 ; DIRECTS the clerk to file the amended complaint 17 -2; GRANTS Pla leave to proceed on a claim against Dr. Marandet and Officer Gray in their individual capacities for money damages for acting with deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment by denying him pain medication and other medical supplies; GRANTS Pla leave to proceed on a claim against Office r Gray in his individual capacity for money damages for violating the Equal Protection Clause by discriminating against Futch on the basis of his financial status with respect to his belongings. DISMISSES all other claims; DIRECTS the clerk and the USMS to issue and serve process on Officer Gray at the Indiana Department of Correction with a copy of this order and the amended complaint 17 -2 as required by 28:1915(d); and ORDERS Dr. Marandet and Officer Gray, pursuant to 42:1997e(g)(2), to respond as provided in the Fed.R.Civ.P. and N.D. Ind. L.R. 10.1, only to the claim for which Pla has been granted leave to proceed in this screening order. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 5/7/2018. (lhc)
February 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 OPINION AND ORDER: Kenny L. Futch is GRANTED until 3/1/18 to file an amended complaint on the proper form, is CAUTIONED that if he does not respond by that deadline this case will be dismissed without further notice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A because the current complaint does not state a claim and the motion to amend ECF 7 is DENIED as unnecessary. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 2/7/18. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nal)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Futch v. Doctor, Nurses John and Jane Doe et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenny L Futch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doctor, Nurses John and Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J Scaife
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?