MILLER v. THE COUNTY OF LAPORTE et al
Plaintiff: WILLIAM H. MILLER, JR.
Defendant: THE COUNTY OF LAPORTE, THE CITY OF LAPORTE, HARLAN WILLIAMS, DON HICKS, NATHAN BATTLEDAY and RODOLFO ESPARZA
Case Number: 3:2017cv00831
Filed: November 3, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: South Bend Office
County: LaPorte
Presiding Judge: Philip P Simon
Presiding Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 59 OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART Defendants' motion for summary judgment 54 Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 12/17/2019. The Motion is GRANTED as to Counts II-IV of the amended complaint and the Clerk is ORDERED to DISMISS THOSE COUNTS WITH PREJUDICE. The Motion is DENIED as to Count I, which is REMANDED back to the La Porte Superior Court. The Clerk is ORDERED to CLOSE this case. (Copy mailed to LaPorte Superior Court) (lhc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MILLER v. THE COUNTY OF LAPORTE et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WILLIAM H. MILLER, JR.
Represented By: Jeffrey E Kimmell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THE COUNTY OF LAPORTE
Represented By: Douglas L Biege
Represented By: Martin W Kus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THE CITY OF LAPORTE
Represented By: Matthew L Hinkle
Represented By: Martin W Kus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HARLAN WILLIAMS
Represented By: Douglas L Biege
Represented By: Martin W Kus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DON HICKS
Represented By: Douglas L Biege
Represented By: Martin W Kus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NATHAN BATTLEDAY
Represented By: Douglas L Biege
Represented By: Martin W Kus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RODOLFO ESPARZA
Represented By: Matthew L Hinkle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?