Maxie v. Rehak

Maxie v. Rehak

Plaintiff:	Michael A Maxie
Defendant:	Michael Rehak
Case Number:	3:2017cv00935
Filed:	December 14, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office:	South Bend Office
County:	St. Joseph
Presiding Judge:	Jon E DeGuilio
Presiding Judge:	Michael G Gotsch
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 22, 2018	Filing 4 OPINION AND ORDER: DISMISSES 1 Pro Se Complaint without prejudice; ORDERS the plaintiff Michael A. Maxie, IDOC # 212676, to pay (and the facility having custody of him to automatically remit) to the clerk of this court 20% of the money he rece ives for each calendar month during which he receives $10.00 or more, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; and DIRECTS the clerk of court to create a ledger for receipt of these funds; and DIRECTS the clerk of court to ensure that a copy of this order is mailed to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 1/22/2018. (Copy mailed to pro se party and St. Joe Co Jail)(lhc)
December 18, 2017	Filing 3 OPINION AND ORDER denying 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Michael Maxie is GRANTED until 1/11/2018 to pay the $400 filing fee and is CAUTIONED that if the fee is not paid by that date, this case will be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 12/18/17. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ksp)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 22, 2018

Filing 4 OPINION AND ORDER: DISMISSES 1 Pro Se Complaint without prejudice; ORDERS the plaintiff Michael A. Maxie, IDOC # 212676, to pay (and the facility having custody of him to automatically remit) to the clerk of this court 20% of the money he rece ives for each calendar month during which he receives $10.00 or more, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; and DIRECTS the clerk of court to create a ledger for receipt of these funds; and DIRECTS the clerk of court to ensure that a copy of this order is mailed to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 1/22/2018. (Copy mailed to pro se party and St. Joe Co Jail)(lhc)

December 18, 2017

Filing 3 OPINION AND ORDER denying 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Michael Maxie is GRANTED until 1/11/2018 to pay the $400 filing fee and is CAUTIONED that if the fee is not paid by that date, this case will be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 12/18/17. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ksp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maxie v. Rehak
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael A Maxie
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Rehak
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?