Lane v. Neal et al
Willie Lane |
Ron Neal, G Payne and Dawn Buss |
3:2018cv00011 |
January 8, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
South Bend Office |
LaPorte |
Jon E DeGuilio |
Michael G Gotsch |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 27 MOTION for Summary Judgment. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter judgment and to close this case. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 4/24/19. (Copy mailed to pro se party via certified mail, receipt no. 7018 0360 0001 4183 7654)(ksp) |
Filing 8 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING Willie Lane leave to proceed on a claim against Dawn Buss in her individual capacity for money damages for preventing Lane from moving to a low floor cell in violation of the Eighth Amendment; DISMISSES Ron Neal and G. P ayne; DISMISSES all other claims; DIRECTS the clerk and the United States Marshals Service to issue and serve process on Dawn Buss at the Indiana Department of Correction with a copy of this order and the complaint (ECF 1 ) as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d); and ORDERS, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), that Dawn Buss respond, as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and N.D. Ind. L.R. 10.1, only to theclaim for which Willie Lane has been granted leave to proceed in this screening order. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 3/20/2018. (Copy mailed as directed in Order)(sct) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.