Utley v. Tibbles et al
Plaintiff: James K Utley
Defendant: Harrison Yancey, Anthony Watson, Ryne Robinson, Arron Jonas, Lt Dykstra, Curtis Gillespie, Carl Tibbles and Carl Tibbes
Miscellaneous_party: WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Case Number: 3:2018cv00226
Filed: March 29, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: South Bend Office
County: Sullivan
Presiding Judge: Jon E DeGuilio
Presiding Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 121 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 116 MOTION to Strike 111 Answer to Interrogatories filed by James K Utley, 92 MOTION for Extension of Time to File filed by James K Utley, 109 MOTION to outline all evidence to be used in this case filed by James K Utley, 114 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by James K Utley, 93 MOTION for Extension of Time to File filed by James K Utley, 107 MOTION to Compel filed by James K Utley, 108 MOTION for Hearing filed by James K Utley, 115 MOTION to Strike 112 Answer to Interrogatories filed by James K Utley, 113 MOTION on Not Getting any Rulling's From the Court on Motions That Utley has put in Some Time Ago, and Not Filing's of Motions & Copy's filed by James K Utley. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 9/4/20. (ksp)
August 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 32 **VACATED per Order DE 34 **OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS James K. Utley leave to proceed against Harrison Yancey, Anthony Watson, Ryne Robinson, Arron Jonas, Lt. Dykstra, Curtis Gillespie, and Carl Tibbles in their individual capacities fo r compensatory and punitive damages for using excessive force against him on March 31, 2016, in violation of the Eighth Amendment and State tort law; and in their individual capacities for compensatory and punitive damages for failing to protect h im from attack on March 31, 2016, in violation of the Eighth Amendment; DISMISSES all other claims; DISMISSES Carl Tibbes; DIRECTS the clerk and the USMS, as required by 28:1915(d), to issue and serve process on Harrison Yancey, Anthony Watson, R yne Robinson, Arron Jonas, Lt. Dykstra, Curtis Gillespie, and Carl Tibbles with a copy of this order and the Complaint 2 ; and ORDERS, pursuant to 42:1997e(g)(2), Harrison Yancey, Anthony Watson, Ryne Robinson, Arron Jonas, Lt. Dykstra, Curtis Gill espie, and Carl Tibbles to respond, as provided for in the FRCP and N.D. Ind. L.R. 10-1(b), only to the claims for which the plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in this screening order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 8/30/2018. (Copy mailed as directed in Order)(lhc) Modified on 8/31/2018 to vacate order(nae).
May 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 OPINION AND ORDER re 2 Pro Se Complaint, The Court GRANTS James K. Utley leave to proceed against Harrison Yancey, AnthonyWatson, Ryne Robinson, Arron Jonas, Lt. Dykstra, Curtis Gillespie, and Carl Tibbles intheir individual capacities for compen satory and punitive damages for using excessiveforce against him on March 31, 2016, in violation of the Eighth Amendment and State tort law; GRANTS James K. Utley leave to proceed against Harrison Yancey, Anthony Watson, Ryne Robinson, Arron Jonas, L t. Dykstra, Curtis Gillespie, and Carl Tibbles in their individual capacities for compensatory and punitive damages for failing to protect him from attack on March 31, 2016, in violation of the Eighth Amendment and State tort law; GRANTS James K. Utl ey leave to proceed against Harrison Yancey, AnthonyWatson, Ryne Robinson, Arron Jonas, Lt. Dykstra, Curtis Gillespie, and Carl Tibbles in their individual capacities for compensatory and punitive damages for failing to protect him from attack on Mar ch 31, 2016, in violation of the Eighth Amendment; DISMISSES all other claims; DISMISSES Carl Tibbes; DIRECTS the clerk and the United States Marshals Service, as required by 28U.S.C. § 1915(d), to issue and serve process on Harrison Yancey, Ant hony Watson, Ryne Robinson, Arron Jonas, Lt. Dykstra, Curtis Gillespie, and Carl Tibbles with a copy of this order and the Complaint (ECF 2); and(6) ORDERS, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), Harrison Yancey, AnthonyWatson, Ryne Robinson, Arro n Jonas, Lt. Dykstra, Curtis Gillespie, and Carl Tibbles to respond, as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and N.D. Ind. L.R. 10-1(b), only to the claims for which the plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in this screening order. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 5/14/18. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mlc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Utley v. Tibbles et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James K Utley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harrison Yancey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anthony Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ryne Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arron Jonas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lt Dykstra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Curtis Gillespie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carl Tibbles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carl Tibbes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Miscellaneous_party: WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?