Close Armstrong LLC v. Trunkline Gas Company
| Close Armstrong LLC |
| Trunkline Gas Company |
| 3:2018cv00270 |
| April 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| South Bend Office |
| Starke |
| Philip P Simon |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
284
OPINION AND ORDER: The court DENIES AS MOOT Trunkline's renewed motion to exclude Mr. Anspach 260 and DENIES IN PART the landowners motion to exclude Dr. Baumguard, Mr. Zellman, and Mr. Enerson 262 , except as to any testimony on the impact o f a Natural Resources Conservation Service wetlands easement on the 100 Line. The court also GRANTS Trunkline's motion to seal the landowners' motion to exclude 263 , with a redacted version of the expert report available on the record [263-1]. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 3/6/24. Associated Cases: 3:18-cv-00270-DRL, 3:18-cv-00494-DRL-MGG (dnj)
|
|
Filing
253
OPINION AND ORDER: The court GRANTS IN PART summary judgment for Trunkline as to the fixation of its reserved, future, moveable, and not yet exercised rights, and DENIES IN PART summary judgment for Trunkline as to the fixation of the corridor surrou nding the 100 Line for that one use [ECF 221 ]; and DENIES summary judgment for the Dicksons and Close Armstrong [ECF 212 ], leaving again the only genuine factual issue for a bench trial. Because this decision may alter the world in which evidence bears on trial, the court DENIES with leave to renew Trunkline's motion to exclude opinion testimony [ECF 211 ]. By separate order, the court will set a Zoom scheduling conference to address scheduling and next steps after conferring with counsel. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 3/31/2023. (dk)
|
|
Filing
173
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court DENIES Trunklines Motion for Leave to File Surreply in opposition to Close Armstrongs Renewed Motion to Compel. [DE 164 ]. The Court also GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the Dicksons Motion to Compel [DE 141 ] and Close Armstrongs Renewed Motion to Compel [DE 158 ]. Trunkline shall supplement its production in response to the Dicksons and Close Armstrongs discovery requests as specified in the order by no later than April 15, 2021. The Court DENIES Plaintif fs requests for attorney fees under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5). The parties are all REMINDED that Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) and this Courts Scheduling Order requires supplementation of all discovery responses every six weeks until trial. All parties are ADMONISHED not to interpret any part of this Opinion and Order as authority for a generalized fishing expedition. The Court GRANTS IN PART the parties Joint Motion [DE 160 ] to set new case management deadlines. The Courts Rule 16(b) Scheduling Orders related to Phase II of this litigation are AMENDED as follows: Mediation Deadline: June 1, 2021; Initial Expert Disclosure Deadline: June 8, 2021; Rebuttal Expert Disclosure Deadline: July 20, 2021; Non-dispositive, discovery-related motion Deadline: September 15, 2021; Completion of all fact and expert discovery: October 15, 2021; Dispositive Motion Deadline: November 15, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 3/31/21. (jld)
|
|
Filing
117
OPINION AND ORDER: The court GRANTS IN PART summary judgment for Trunkline 69 , 72 , but only in this manner for phase I. Whether the easement on each property has become subject to an equitable limitation or fixed by selection, use, or consent under Indiana law, and what the scope of the one easement ultimately will be under this mixed question of law and fact, such issues are reserved for phase II. The court DENIES AS MOOT Trunkline's motions to strike affirmative defenses and exhibits 97 , 101 for purposes of phase I. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 1/21/2020. (lhc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Close Armstrong LLC v. Trunkline Gas Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Close Armstrong LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jere L Humphrey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Trunkline Gas Company | |
| Represented By: | A Richard M Blaiklock |
| Represented By: | Ryan J Vershay |
| Represented By: | Thomas A Withrow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
