Gregory v. Zimmerman et al
| Michael K Gregory |
| K Zimmerman, Lopez, A Lagunas, C Woolfork, M Florer, M Maldonado and S Beach |
| 3:2018cv00444 |
| June 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| South Bend Office |
| Sullivan |
| Philip P Simon |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
222
OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff Michael Gregory's 209 unopposed Motion to File Under Seal Exhibit C to his Motion for Indemnification is GRANTED. Plaintiff Gregory's 207 Motion for Indemnification is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to indemnification being sought in a state court proceeding. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 3/2/23. (nal)
|
|
Filing
220
OPINION AND ORDER: All claims that were or could have been made by Michael K. Gregory against defendants Zimmerman, Lagunas, Maldonado, Florer and Beach arising from the events PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall enter a judgment against defendants Zimm erman, Lagunas, defendant Lopez can be entered on the basis of the summary judgment granted October 4, 2019 57 . With the entry of these judgments, this matter is CLOSED, without prejudice to the continued consideration of post-judgment motions pertaining to efforts to collect on Gregorys judgment against defendant Woolfork. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 2/21/2023. (shk)
|
|
Filing
172
OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Spoliation Sanctions 130 and 131 is GRANTED to the extent indicated in the accompanying opinion. In all other respects, the motion is DENIED. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 7/13/2022. (shk)
|
|
Filing
137
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART 135 Motion Contempt Order, Default Judgment, and Sanctions against Defendant Courtney Woolfork. The Clerk is directed to enter default against Defendant Courtney Woolfork. Judgment will be entered once Gregory files proof of damages. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 1/13/22. (cc: pro se party) (mlc) Modified on 1/14/2022 to add routing (mlc).
|
|
Filing
57
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 53 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Lopez. The Court DISMISSES Michael Lopez, and REMINDS the parties this case is now proceeding solely on a claim by Michael K. Gregory against K. Zimmerman, A. Lagunas, C. W oolfork, M. Florer, M. Maldonado, and S. Beach in their individual capacities for compensatory and punitive damages for using excessive force against him on April 2, 2017, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 10/4/19. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ksp)
|
|
Filing
6
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS Michael K. Gregory leave to proceed against K. Zimmerman, Lopez, A. Lagunas, C. Woolfork, M. Florer, M. Maldonado, and S. Beach in their individual capacities for compensatory and punitive damages for using exce ssive force against him on April 2, 2017, in violation of the Eighth Amendment; DISMISSES all other claims; DIRECTS the clerk and the USMS, as required by 28:1915(d), to issue and serve process at the IDOC on K. Zimmerman, Lopez, A. Lagunas, C. W oolfork, M. Florer, M. Maldonado, and S. Beach with a copy of this order and the Complaint 1 ; and ORDERS, pursuant to 42:1997e(g)(2), K. Zimmerman, Lopez, A. Lagunas, C. Woolfork, M. Florer, M. Maldonado, and S. Beach to respond, as provided for in the FRCP and N.D. Ind. L.R. 10-1(b), only to the claims for which the plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in this screening order. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 9/20/2018. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(lhc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
