Lalonde v. United States of America et al
John Stephen Lalonde |
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Attorney General Jefferson Sessions, United States of America and Jefferson Sessions |
3:2018cv00548 |
July 19, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
South Bend Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Michael G Gotsch |
Philip P Simon |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Federal Bureau of Investigation, Jefferson Sessions, United States of America, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. NOTE: The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. (sct) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons filed by John Stephen Lalonde. (Blatt, Benjamin) |
Judge Philip P Simon and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (New Case) (sct) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin Max Blatt on behalf of John Stephen Lalonde (Blatt, Benjamin) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT 3;18-cv-548 against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-3627105.), filed by John Stephen Lalonde. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit "1", #3 Exhibit Exhibit "2", #4 Exhibit Exhibit "3", #5 Proposed Summons Summons for USA, #6 Proposed Summons Summons for AG Sessions, #7 Proposed Summons Summons for FBI)(Blatt, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.