Brown v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
| Kim Ellen Brown |
| Johnson & Johnson Services Inc, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson International and DePuy Inc |
| 3:2018cv00793 |
| September 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CERTIFIED CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-305) transferring case to MDL 2244 in the Northern District of Texas before Judge James Edgar Kinkeade. Signed by Jeffery N Luthi, Clerk of the Panel on 10/25/18. (jld) |
| Filing 3 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-305) transferring case to MDL-2244 in the Northern District of Texas before Judge James Edgar Kinkeade. Signed by Jeffery N Luthi, Clerk of the Panel on 10/25/2018. (jld) |
| Filing 2 Letter filed with Judicial Panel in MDL #2244 (nae) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-3689875.), filed by Kim Ellen Brown. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Waiver of Service, #3 Proposed Summons Waiver of Service, #4 Proposed Summons Waiver of Service, #5 Proposed Summons Waiver of Service, #6 Proposed Summons Waiver of Service)(Garnett, H) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
