Hamman v. Starke County et al
| Jennifer Hamman |
| Starke County Indiana, Jane or John Doe, Knox Police Chief Harold Smith, Corporal Chad Dulin, Knox Indiana City of, Starke County Sheriff's Department, Starke County, Harold Smith, Chad Dulin and Knox City of |
| 3:2018cv00952 |
| November 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Philip P Simon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
|
|
| Filing 20 MOTION for Leave to Appear Telephonically by Estate Plaintiff Jennifer Hamman. (Pavlack, Eric) |
|
|
|
|
| Filing 17 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply (Agreed) by Defendants Starke County, Starke County Sheriff's Department. (Baron, Lisa) |
| Filing 16 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Chad Dulin, Knox City of, Harold Smith. (Keen, Robert) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Knox City of, Harold Smith, Chad Dulin.(Keen, Robert) Modified on 1/15/2019 (mlc). |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jennifer Hamman. Knox City of served on 11/29/2018, answer due 1/14/2019. (Pavlack, Eric) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due for defendants Starke County and State County Sheriff's Department on 1/18/2019. Answer due for defendants Dulin, City of Knox, and Harold Smith on 1/14/19. (jld) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jennifer Hamman. Starke County served on 11/30/2018, answer due 12/21/2018. (Pavlack, Eric) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jennifer Hamman. Starke County Sheriff's Department served on 11/26/2018, answer due 12/17/2018. (Pavlack, Eric) |
| Filing 11 AGREED NOTICE to extend time to file answer filed by Chad Dulin, Knox City of, Harold Smith ; answer due by January 14, 2019. (Keen, Robert) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth A Knight on behalf of Starke County, Starke County Sheriff's Department (Knight, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 9 AGREED NOTICE to extend time to file answer filed by Starke County, Starke County Sheriff's Department ; answer due by January 18, 2019. (Baron, Lisa) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Lisa A Baron on behalf of Starke County, Starke County Sheriff's Department (Baron, Lisa) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jennifer Hamman. Harold Smith served on 11/26/2018, answer due 12/17/2018. (Pavlack, Eric) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jennifer Hamman. Chad Dulin served on 11/28/2018, answer due 12/19/2018. (Pavlack, Eric) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric S Pavlack on behalf of Jennifer Hamman (Pavlack, Eric) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert T Keen, Jr on behalf of Chad Dulin, Knox City of, Harold Smith (Keen, Robert) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Chad Dulin, Knox City of, Harold Smith, Starke County, Starke County Sheriff's Department. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (sct) |
| Judge Philip P Simon and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (New Case) (sct) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Colin E Flora on behalf of Jennifer Hamman (Flora, Colin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-3739856.), filed by Jennifer Hamman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Flora, Colin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.