Dodd v. Warden
Petitioner: Jermaine D'Shann Dodd
Respondent: Warden
Case Number: 3:2019cv00029
Filed: January 14, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Referring Judge: Philip P Simon
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2019 Filing 7 Petitioner's MOTION Notifying the Court of Petitioners First Amended Petition 28 U.S.C.2254 Habeas Corpus Petition DE #5 Challenging a Prison Disciplinary Proceeding That Half of Petitioner's Exhibits and Pictures of Evidence Has Been Removed Upon CM/ECF E-Filing Without Petitioner's Consent That Petitioner Requests this Court to Transfer Petitioner's Original Exhibits Document DE #1 -1 filed 1/14/19 of ECF 1 Pages (1) Through (19) to Petitioner's First Amended Petition Filed on 2/15/19 by Petitioner Jermaine D'Shann Dodd. (nae)
February 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: The Court GRANTS Jermaine D'Shann Dodd until 3/22/2019 to resolve his filing fee status by paying the $5.00 filing fee or by submitting a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a copy of his inmate trust account ledger, and CAUTIONS him that if he does not respond by that date, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 2/25/19. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ksp)
February 15, 2019 Filing 5 Amended PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jermaine D'Shann Dodd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(nae)
February 15, 2019 ***Amended Pleadings Deadline terminated. (nae)
February 8, 2019 Filing 4 RECEIPT of Duplicate copy of DE #3 Notice of Change of Cell address from Jermaine D'Shann Dodd. (File stamped 2/8/19, received by ISP E-filing on 2/15/19) (nae)
February 8, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE titled as Petitioner's Motion of Notice of Change of Address by Jermaine D'Shann Dodd notifying the court of a cell location change inside of Indiana State Prison. (nae)
February 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: The Court DENIES Jermaine D'Shann Dodd's petition for writ of habeas corpus ECF #1 , DIRECTS the clerk to place this cause number on a blank AO 241 (Rev. 1/15) (INND Prison Disciplinary Rev. 8/16) and send it to Jermaine D'Shann Dodd, GRANTS Jermaine DShann Dodd to and including 3/15/19 to file an amended habeas corpus petition and CAUTIONS Jermaine D'Shann Dodd that if he does not respond by that deadline this case will be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 2/4/19. (Copy mailed as directed in Order). (nal)
January 14, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jermaine D'Shann Dodd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(jld) (copy returned to petitioner)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dodd v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jermaine D'Shann Dodd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?