Owen v. Eddy et al
Donald Ray Owen, Jr |
Ryall, Addair and Eddy |
3:2019cv00122 |
February 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Jon E DeGuilio |
Michael G Gotsch |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Eddy. Eddy waiver sent on 3/26/2019, answer due 5/28/2019. (DeBoni, Michael) |
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Addair. Addair waiver sent on 3/26/2019, answer due 5/28/2019. (DeBoni, Michael) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael F DeBoni on behalf of Addair, Eddy (DeBoni, Michael) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons sent to Officer Eddy and Officer Addair. (Copy mailed as directed in Order) Waiver of Service due by 4/25/2019. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Order) (mlc) |
![]() |
Filing 4 Initial Partial Filing fee: $ 15.14, receipt number 3021885 (jld) |
![]() |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Donald Ray Owen, Jr. (nae) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with 1 copies of summons forms and 1 copies of USM-285 forms against Addair, Eddy, Ryall, filed by Donald Ray Owen, Jr. (Returned file stamped copy with case number to Owen) (Attachments: #1 USM 285 and Proposed Summons, #2 Envelope)(nae) Modified on 2/26/2019 to correct typo(sct). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.