Stetzel v. Kinum, Inc
| Megan J. Stetzel |
| Kinum, Inc |
| 3:2019cv00203 |
| March 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Philip P Simon |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Kinum, Inc.(Levi, Nicholas) |
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Kinum, Inc answer due 6/14/2019. Approved by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 5/24/19. (slm)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Kinum, Inc. (Levi, Nicholas) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendants unopposed motion (DE #10 ). The Court will entertain an amended motion that satisfies the requirements set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A) if, and only if, it is filed on or before 5/24/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 5/17/2019. (sct)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Kinum, Inc. (Levi, Nicholas) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Kinum, Inc. (Levi, Nicholas) |
| Filing 8 AGREED NOTICE to extend time to file answer filed by Kinum, Inc ; answer due by 5/17/19. (Levi, Nicholas) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas W Levi on behalf of Kinum, Inc (Levi, Nicholas) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Megan J. Stetzel. Kinum, Inc served on 3/29/2019, answer due 4/19/2019. (Sulaiman, Omar) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Kinum, Inc. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (sct) |
| Judge Philip P Simon and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (New Case) (sct) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexander J Taylor on behalf of Megan J. Stetzel (Taylor, Alexander) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Marwan R Daher on behalf of Megan J. Stetzel (Daher, Marwan) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Omar T Sulaiman on behalf of Megan J. Stetzel (Sulaiman, Omar) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Kinum, Inc( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-3844548.), filed by Megan J. Stetzel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Sulaiman, Omar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stetzel v. Kinum, Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kinum, Inc | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas W Levi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Megan J. Stetzel | |
| Represented By: | Marwan R Daher |
| Represented By: | Alexander J Taylor |
| Represented By: | Omar T Sulaiman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
