Boyd v. Warden
Vincent W Boyd |
Warden |
3:2019cv00253 |
March 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Michael G Gotsch |
Robert L Miller |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed on 5/6/2019 as to #11 Clerks Judgment, #10 Opinion and Order. (bas) |
Filing 13 ORDER denying #12 Motion to Amend. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 5/7/2019. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(bas) |
Filing 12 Petitioner's MOTION to Amend #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Vincent W Boyd. (nae) |
Filing 11 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (Mailed to pro se party by certified mail 7000 1670 0012 9261 0075) (bas) |
Filing 10 OPINION AND ORDER re #7 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Court DENIES the amended habeas corpus petition pursuant to Section 2254 Habeas Corpus Rule 4. Court DENIES Petitioner a certificate of appealability pursuant to Habeas Corpus Rule 11. Court DIRECTS the clerk to enter judgment in favor of the Respondent and against the Petitioner. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 5/1/2019. (Copy mailed to pro se party by certified mail 7000 1670 0012 9261 0075)(bas) |
Filing 8 Petitioner's Exhaustion of Legal Remedies by Vincent W Boyd (nae) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Amend Petition re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Vincent W Boyd. (nae) |
Filing 6 ORDER denying #5 Motion of Facts and Findings. The plaintiff is reminded that he has until 5/3/19 to file an amended habeas petition. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 4/22/19. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(tlr) |
Filing 9 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Vincent W Boyd. (nae) |
Filing 5 Petitioner's MOTION of Facts and Findings by Petitioner Vincent W Boyd. (nae) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/24/2019: #1 Corrected Main Document) (nae). |
Filing 4 Petitioner's BRIEF Memorandum of Law re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (nae) |
Filing 3 ORDER: The Court DENIES the petition (ECF 1); DENIES the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF 2); and GRANTS Vincent W. Boyd until 5/3/2019 to file an amended petition and to resolve his filing fee status. If Mr. Boyd doesn't respond before this deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 4/4/19. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ksp) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Vincent W Boyd. (nae) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Vincent W Boyd. (Returned copy with case number to Boyd)(nae) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Boyd v. Warden | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Vincent W Boyd | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.