Armstrong v. Warden
| Andrew Armstrong |
| Warden |
| 3:2019cv00257 |
| April 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Philip P Simon |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed on Andrew Armstrong as to #8 Opinion and Order,, Terminate Civil Case, #9 Clerks Judgment. (mlc) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (Copy mailed to pro se party by cert mail 7018 0360 0001 4183 7838) (mlc) |
Filing 8
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING the habeas corpus petition. The clerk is DIRECTEDto enter judgment and close this case. Andrew Armstrong is DENIED leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 6/25/19. (Copy mailed to pro se party by cert mail 7018 0360 0001 4183 7838)(mlc)
|
| Filing 7 Letter from Clerk, Southern District of Indiana regarding transfer of case (jld) |
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Indiana Southern; Case Number 1:19-cv-00993. Original file and docket sheet received. |
| Filing 5 Transfer Letter to Clerk of the Northern District of Indiana. Case transferred electronically to Northern District of Indiana, on 3/26/2019. (CKM) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 4/1/2019.] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER - TRANSFERRING ACTION TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA, SOUTH BEND DIVISION; Mr. Armstrong is in custody in the Northern District and the disciplinary proceeding his petition challenges took place in the Northern District, his petition must be heard in the Northern District. This action is therefore TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana at South Bend, Indiana. No ruling has been issued on the pending motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/26/2019. Copy Mailed.(CKM) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 4/1/2019.]
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 4/1/2019.] |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Petitioner ANDREW ARMSTRONG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Offender Trust Inquiry, #2 Envelope)(REO) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 4/1/2019.] Modified on 4/1/2019 (jld). |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by ANDREW ARMSTRONG. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Disciplinary documents, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(REO) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 4/1/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Armstrong v. Warden | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Andrew Armstrong | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
