Rodgers v. Titus et al
| Andrew Rodgers |
| Joshua Titus, Barnes and Elkhart Police Department |
| 3:2019cv00369 |
| May 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Philip P Simon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons sent to Police Officer Joshua Titus, Police Officer Barnes and Elkhart Police Department. (Copy mailed as directed in Order) Waiver of Service due by 7/11/2019. (Attachments: #1 Order, #2 Complaint) (mlc) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Payment of the filing fee is DEFERRED. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d), the clerk and the United States Marshals Service are DIRECTED to issue and serve process to (1) Police Officer Joshua Titus, (2) Police Officer Barnes, and (3) Elkhart Police Department, all at: 175 Waterfall Dr., Elkhart, IN 46516. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 6/11/19. (Copy mailed to pro se party and defendants)(mlc)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Andrew Rodgers. (nae) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with 3 copies of summons forms and 3 copies of USM-285 forms against Barnes, Elkhart Police Department, Joshua Titus, filed by Andrew Rodgers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed summons and USM 285 forms)(nae) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
