Fessenden v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Donald C. Fessenden |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA (Court Use Only) |
| 3:2019cv00380 |
| May 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Theresa L Springmann |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Keeya M Jeffrey on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Jeffrey, Keeya)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Donald C. Fessenden. Commissioner of Social Security served on 5/29/2019, answer due 7/29/2019. (Fisher, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Sharon Jefferson - AUSA on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Jefferson - AUSA, Sharon)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. NOTE: The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. (rmc)
|
|
Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann added. (NEW CASE) (rmc)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer L Fisher on behalf of Donald C. Fessenden (Fisher, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-3895023.), filed by Donald C. Fessenden. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Fisher, Jennifer)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
