Hartgrove et al v. United States Postal Service
| Jeff Hartgrove and Victoria Hartgrove |
| United States Postal Service |
| 3:2019cv00415 |
| May 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Philip P Simon |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING #5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Victoria Hartgrove, Jeff Hartgrove. All claims against Defendant, the United States Postal Service, are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 6/24/19. (ksp)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by Plaintiffs Jeff Hartgrove, Victoria Hartgrove. (Foley, Edmond) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Per DE 4, answer due 7/8/2019. (ksp) |
| Filing 4 AGREED NOTICE to extend time to file answer filed by United States Postal Service ; answer due by July 8, 2019. (DeLor - AUSA, Dirk) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Dirk D DeLor - AUSA on behalf of United States Postal Service (DeLor - AUSA, Dirk) |
| NEW CASE Judge Philip P Simon and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (nae) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Joseph Superior/Circuit Court, Cause No. 71D07-1904-CT-000165, filed by United States Postal Service. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ault - AUSA, Wayne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
