JS et al v. Manchester Community Schools Corporation et al
Robert Sklar and JS |
North Manchester Town of, Manchester Community Schools Corporation and Town of North Manchester Police Department |
3:2019cv00421 |
May 31, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Michael G Gotsch |
Philip P Simon |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER denying #2 Motion for TRO. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 5/31/2019. (Note: Called Robert Sklar at the telephone number listed on the docket sheet). (nac) Modified on 5/31/2019 to indicate that Robert Sklar was provided the Court Order by email. (nac). |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Manchester Community Schools Corporation, North Manchester Town of, Town of North Manchester Police Department. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (lns) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Plaintiffs JS, Robert Sklar. (lns) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Manchester Community Schools Corporation, North Manchester Town of, Town of North Manchester Police Department (Filing fee $ 400.00, Receipt #INN1010113), filed by JS, Robert Sklar.(lns) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.