Hines v. Warden
Adrian Hines |
Warden |
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only) |
3:2019cv00489 |
June 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Michael G Gotsch |
Robert L Miller |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The respondent is ORDERED to enter an appearance by 9/13/19 and file a response to the petition with the entire administrative record by 10/18/19. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 8/7/19. (Copy mailed to Warden). (nal) |
Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number INN1010368 (bas) |
Filing 3 Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program (ISP) by Adrian Hines (nae) |
Filing 2 ORDER GRANTING Petitioner until 8/9/2019 to resolve his filing fee status by paying the $5.00 filing fee or by submitting a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a copy of his inmate trust account ledger and CAUTIONS him that if he does not respond by that date, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 7/9/2019. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(bas) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Adrian Hines. (No filing fee or IFP received) (Returned file stamped copy with case number to Hines) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(nae) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.