Rhode v. Warden
Robert Rhode and Robert F Rhode |
Warden |
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only) |
3:2019cv00522 |
July 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Jon E DeGuilio |
Michael G Gotsch |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program (Westville Correctional Facility) by Robert Rhode. (mrm) |
Filing 8 Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program (Westville) by Robert Rhode (nae) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address by Robert Rhode from Indiana State Prison to Westville Correctional Facility (nae) |
Filing 6 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 3022860 received from Carolyn (mother of Robert Rhode) (nae) |
Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE as to #3 Opinion and Order and #4 Clerks Judgment. (nal) |
Filing 4 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (Copy mailed to pro se party via Certified Mail, receipt # 7099 3400 0003 4515 7322) (jat) |
|
Filing 2 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel to Pursue Habeas Corpus Proceedings by Petitioner Robert Rhode. (nae) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Robert Rhode. (No filing fee or IFP received) (Returned file stamped copy to Rhode) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(nae) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.