Newman v. Luber
Plaintiff: Daniel Newman
Defendant: Anthoney Luber
Case Number: 3:2019cv00541
Filed: July 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Referring Judge: Philip P Simon
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DENYING the relief requested in #8 Motion. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 8/20/19. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ksp)
August 8, 2019 Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed on 08/05/2019 as to #5 Order Dismissing Case and #6 Clerks Judgment. (jat)
August 6, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION (Request) for Order by Plaintiff Daniel Newman. (nae)
July 31, 2019 Filing 6 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (Copy mailed to pro se party via certified mail receipt 7099 3400 0003 4515 9364). (shk)
July 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The Court DISMISSES this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A because the complaint does not state a claim; and DIRECTS the clerk to send Daniel Newman a blank habeas corpus petition, AO-241 (Rev. 1/15) (Conviction, INND Rev. 8/16) and a blank prisoner in formapauperis petition. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 7/30/2019. (Copy of order mailed to pro se party along with a blank habeas corpus petition and prisoner in forma pauperis petition. Certified mail receipt 7099 3400 0003 4515 9364)(shk) Modified on 8/1/2019 (shk).
July 19, 2019 Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Daniel Newman. (nae)
July 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Court WAIVES the initial partial filing fee, ORDERS the plaintiff, Daniel Newman, IDOC #UNKNOWN, St. Joseph County Jail #67741 to pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full, DIRECTS the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds and DIRECTS the clerk to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 7/17/19. (Copy mailed as directed in Order). (nal)
July 12, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Daniel Newman. (nae)
July 12, 2019 Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with 1 copies of summons forms and 2 copies of USM-285 forms against Anthoney Luber, filed by Daniel Newman. (Returned file stamped copy with case number to Newman) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons and USM form, #2 Envelope)(nae)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Newman v. Luber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anthoney Luber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?