Veatch v. Dexter Axle Inc et al
| Whitney E Veatch |
| David Fowler, Drexel Axle and Dexter Axle Inc |
| 3:2019cv00602 |
| August 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Damon R Leichty |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Dexter Axle Inc, David Fowler. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (ksc) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel H Pfeifer on behalf of Whitney E Veatch (Pfeifer, Daniel) |
| Judge Damon R Leichty and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added (NEW CASE). (ksc) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Whitney E Veatch. (McQuary, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey S McQuary on behalf of Whitney E Veatch (McQuary, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dexter Axle Inc, David Fowler( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-3972774.), filed by Whitney E Veatch. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons to Dexter Axle Inc, #3 Proposed Summons to David Fowler)(McQuary, Jeffrey) Modified to correct defendant name on 8/9/2019 (ksc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
