Hamilton v. Warden et al
DeAndre Hamilton |
Masson, Wexford, Warden, Sgt Gordon, Suzen and Sgt. Adrianne Ball |
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only) |
3:2019cv00615 |
August 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
South Bend Office |
Michael G Gotsch |
Damon R Leichty |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Mollie A Slinker on behalf of Sgt Gordon (Slinker, Mollie) |
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Sgt Gordon. Sgt Gordon waiver sent on 8/15/2019, answer due 10/15/2019. (Skates, Brandon) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Brandon A Skates on behalf of Sgt Gordon (Skates, Brandon) |
Filing 5 Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program by DeAndre Hamilton (mrm) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons sent to Officer Masson and Sergeant Gordon. Waiver of Service due by 9/16/2019. (Attachments: #1 Order, #2 Complaint) (nal) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with 0 copies of summons forms and 0 copies of USM-285 forms against Sgt Gordon, Masson, Suzen, Warden, Wexford, filed by DeAndre Hamilton. (No filing fee or IFP received) (Returned file stamped copy with case number) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nae) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.