Martin v. Marshall County Jail et al
| David Martin |
| Sgt. Holcomb and Marshall County Jail |
| 3:2019cv00696 |
| August 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Robert L Miller |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Court DIRECTS the clerk to place this cause number on a blank Prisoner Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis AO240 (Rev.7/10) (INND Rev. 8/16) and send it to David Martin and GRANTS David Martin until 9/30/19 to return the form with his trust fund ledgers for the past six months. If Mr. Martin doesn't respond by the deadline, this case will be dismissed without further notice, which will not relieve him of the obligation to pay the filing fee in installments over time. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 9/16/19. (Copy mailed as directed in Order). (nal)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff David Martin. (shk) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with 0 copies of summons forms and 0 copies of USM-285 forms against Sgt. Holcomb and Marshall County Jail, filed by David Martin. (Copy of complaint with case number mailed to pro se party). (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(shk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
