Martin v. Marks et al
Plaintiff: Nathan Martin
Defendant: PRM Trucking, Inc. and Kenneth Marks
Case Number: 3:2019cv00726
Filed: September 9, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Jon E DeGuilio
Referring Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: This Court now ADOPTS the parties discovery plan andestablishes the following deadlines: Pre-Discovery Disclosures will be exchange by 11/26/2019. The last date for the completion of all fact and expert discovery is 3/30/2021. The serving of reports from retained experts are due from plaintiffs by 10/9/2020 and from defendants by 1/20/2021. The last date to amend the pleadings without leave of court as to plaintiff is 1/31/2020 and defendants is 2/28/2020. The parties shall name a mediator no later than 12/16/2019. The deadline for the parties to engage in mediation is 12/31/2020. The Court hereby VACATES the status conference for November 14, 2019 at 11:30 A.M. (EST). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 10/30/2019. (shk)
October 28, 2019 Filing 8 REPORT by Kenneth Marks, PRM Trucking, Inc. of Parties' Planning Meeting. (Portelli, James)
October 9, 2019 Filing 7 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties.. (slm)
October 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Joint Proposed Discovery due by 10/29/2019. Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 11/14/2019 11:30 AM in US District Court - South Bend before Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch Sr.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 10/9/19. (slm)
September 23, 2019 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Kenneth Marks, PRM Trucking, Inc..(Portelli, James)
September 10, 2019 Judge Jon E DeGuilio and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. NEW CASE (kjp)
September 9, 2019 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Kenneth Marks, PRM Trucking, Inc.. (Portelli, James)
September 9, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by James M Portelli on behalf of All Defendants (Portelli, James)
September 9, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-4001657.) from Kosciusko Superior Court, Cause No. 43D04-1907-CT-000040, filed by Kenneth Marks, PRM Trucking, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Complaint), #2 Exhibit B (Affidavit of Counsel), #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Portelli, James)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin v. Marks et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathan Martin
Represented By: Trevor J Crossen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PRM Trucking, Inc.
Represented By: James M Portelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kenneth Marks
Represented By: James M Portelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?