Gibson v. Warden
| Jason Gibson and Jason Michael Gibson |
| Warden |
| MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only) |
| 3:2019cv00873 |
| October 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Damon R Leichty |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed as to Jason Gibson on 10/28/19 #3 Clerks Judgment, #2 Opinion and Order,, Terminate Civil Case,. (mlc) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (Copy mailed to pro se party by cert mail 7018 0360 0001 4183 8040) (mlc) |
Filing 2
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING the habeas corpus petition (ECF 1); The filing fee is WAIVED; The is DIRECTED clerk to enter judgment and close this case; and Jason Gibson is DENIED leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 10/23/19. (Copy mailed to pro se party by cert mail 7018 0360 0001 4183 8040)(mlc)
|
| Filing 4 Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program (Miami) by Jason Gibson (nae) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jason Gibson. (No filing fee or IFP received) (Returned copy with case number to Gibson) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(nae) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
