Westfield Insurance Company v. Rupert et al
| Westfield Insurance Company |
| Marjorie Rupert, John P Rupert and Joshua Glen Fugate |
| 3:2019cv00955 |
| October 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Philip P Simon |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Defendants John P. Rupert and Marjorie Rupert's ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by John P Rupert, Marjorie Rupert.(Marnocha, Margaret) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Joshua Glen Fugate.(Deets, Nicholas) |
Filing 13
ORDER: The Rupert Defendants' amended motion and Defendant Fugate'smotion are GRANTED. #11 and #12 . The deadline for all Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint is EXTENDED until December 26, 2019. The Rupert Defendants' original motion to extend their answer deadline is DENIED AS MOOT. #10 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 12/9/19. (ksp)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant Joshua Glen Fugate. (Deets, Nicholas) |
| Filing 11 Amended MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint, by Defendants John P Rupert, Marjorie Rupert. (Marnocha, Margaret) Modified on 11/21/2019 to edit docket text to match document (nae). |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Defendants John P Rupert, Marjorie Rupert. (Marnocha, Margaret) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Margaret M Marnocha on behalf of John P Rupert, Marjorie Rupert (Marnocha, Margaret) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas C Deets on behalf of Joshua Glen Fugate (Deets, Nicholas) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Westfield Insurance Company. Joshua Glen Fugate served on 11/2/2019, answer due 11/25/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of Service - Joshua Glen Fugate)(Vitone, Linda) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Westfield Insurance Company. Marjorie Rupert served on 11/2/2019, answer due 11/25/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of Service - Marjorie Rupert)(Vitone, Linda) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Westfield Insurance Company. John P Rupert served on 11/2/2019, answer due 11/25/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of Service - John Rupert)(Vitone, Linda) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Joshua Glen Fugate, John P Rupert, Marjorie Rupert. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (ksp) |
| Judge Philip P Simon and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (NEW CASE) (ksp) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Westfield Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Ohio Farmers Insurance Company for Westfield Insurance Company.. (Vitone, Linda) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Linda L Vitone on behalf of Westfield Insurance Company (Vitone, Linda) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-4049455.), filed by Westfield Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Policy, #2 Exhibit B - Amended Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons John P Rupert, #5 Proposed Summons Marjorie Rupert, #6 Proposed Summons Joshua Glen Fugate)(Vitone, Linda) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
