Vojtko v. Pekin Insurance Company
Vincent Vojtko |
Pekin Insurance Company |
3:2019cv01028 |
November 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Michael G Gotsch |
Philip P Simon |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 SCHEDULING ORDER: Pre-Discovery Disclosures deadline is 1/24/2020. The last date for the completion of all fact and expert discovery is 8/30/2020. The serving of reports from retained experts under Rule 26(a)(2) are due from plaintiff by 5/29/2020 and from defendant by 6/30/2020. The last date to amend the pleadings without leave of court as to plaintiff is 3/31/2020 and as to defendant is 2/28/2020. The parties shall name a mediator no laterthan 2/21/2020. The deadline for the parties to engage in mediation is 9/21/2020. The Court hereby VACATES the scheduling conference for 1/16/2020 at 10:15 A.M. (EST). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 1/10/2020. (shk) |
Filing 11 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Kaczmarek, Matthew) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin E Warren on behalf of Vincent Vojtko (Warren, Kevin) |
Filing 8 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties.. (slm) |
Filing 7 ORDER Joint Proposed Discovery due by 1/6/2020., Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 1/16/2020 10:15 AM in US District Court - South Bend before Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch Sr.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 12/16/19. (slm) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by James T Flanigan on behalf of Pekin Insurance Company (Flanigan, James) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Pekin Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Davis, Grover) |
**NEW CASE** Judge Philip P Simon and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (shk) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Pekin Insurance Company. (Davis, Grover) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Grover B Davis on behalf of Pekin Insurance Company (Davis, Grover) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-4061449.) from St. Joseph Superior Court, Cause No. 71D06-1910-PL-000388, filed by Pekin Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Claim for Damages - 238 Zigler, #3 Exhibit B - Claim for Damages - 226 Zigler, #4 Exhibit C - CCS and Pleadings Filed, #5 Exhibit D - Notice of Filing Removal, #6 Exhibit E - Certificate of Filing in State Court)(Davis, Grover) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Vojtko v. Pekin Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Pekin Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Grover B Davis |
Represented By: | James T Flanigan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Vincent Vojtko | |
Represented By: | Kevin E Warren |
Represented By: | Matthew R Kaczmarek |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.