Holderman v. Marshall Co Sheriffs Dept et al
| Taran J Holderman |
| Marshall Co Sheriffs Dept, Matthew Hassel and Beau Holcomb |
| 3:2019cv01030 |
| November 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Damon R Leichty |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth A Knight on behalf of Matthew Hassel, Beau Holcomb, Marshall Co Sheriffs Dept (Knight, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Beau Holcomb, Matthew Hassel, Marshall Co Sheriffs Dept. Beau Holcomb waiver sent on 12/2/2019, answer due 1/31/2020; Matthew Hassel waiver sent on 12/2/2019, answer due 1/31/2020; Marshall Co Sheriffs Dept waiver sent on 12/2/2019, answer due 1/31/2020. (Baron, Lisa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Lisa A Baron on behalf of Matthew Hassel, Beau Holcomb, Marshall Co Sheriffs Dept (Baron, Lisa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons sent to Sheriff Hassel, Sergeant Holcomb and the Marshall Countys Sheriffs Department. (Copy mailed to defendants). Waiver of Service due by 1/2/2020. (Attachments: #1 Order, #2 Complaint) (nal) |
Filing 4
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS Taran J. Holderman leave to proceed on a Fourteenth Amendment claim against Sheriff Hassel and Sergeant Holcomb for money damages for allegedly subjecting him to overcrowded conditions since May 2019, GRANTS Taran J. Holderman leave to proceed on a Fourteenth Amendment claim against the Marshall County Sheriff's Department for money damages for allegedly maintaining a policy or practicing of overcrowding at the Marshall County Jail, DISMISSES all other claims, DIRECTS the clerk and the United States Marshals Service to issue and serve process on Sheriff Hassel, Sergeant Holcomb and the Marshall County's Sheriff's Department at the Marshall County Jail with a copy of this order and the complaint ECF #1 as required by 28 U.S.C. 1915(d) and ORDERS, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1997e(g)(2), Sheriff Hassel, Sergeant Holcomb and the Marshall County's Sheriff's Department to respond, as provided for in the Federal Rules of CivilProcedure and N.D. Ind. L.R. 10-1(b), only to the claims for which Taran J. Holderman has been granted leave to proceed in this screening order. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 11/26/19. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nal)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; WAIVES the initial partial filing fee; ORDERING Plaintiff to pay to the clerk 20% of money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; and DIRECTING the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds; and DIRECTING the clerk to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 11/26/2019. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mrm)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Taran J Holderman. (nae) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Matthew Hassel, Beau Holcomb, Marshall Co Sheriffs Dept, filed by Taran J Holderman. (Returned file stamped copy with case number to Holderman) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nae) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
