Mudica v. Warden
Petitioner: Donald E Mudica, III
Respondent: Warden
Not Yet Classified: WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Case Number: 3:2019cv01056
Filed: November 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Referring Judge: Philip P Simon
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ***DOCKETED IN ERROR - PLEASE DISREGARD*** OPINION AND ORDER: The court DENIES the habeas corpus petition #1 , DIRECTS the clerk to enter judgment, and DENIES Donald E. Mudica, III, leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 1/3/2020. (shk) Modified on 1/3/2020 (ksc).
December 5, 2019 Filing 6 Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program by Donald E Mudica, III. Pursuant to General Order 2018-1, documents submitted to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (nae)
December 4, 2019 Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed as to Donald Mudica re #3 Clerks Judgment, #2 Opinion and Order,, Terminate Civil Case,. (mlc)
November 27, 2019 Filing 3 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (cc: copy mailed to pro se party via certified mail, receipt no. 7018 0360 0001 4183 8620) (ksp)
November 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 OPINION AND ORDER: The Court DENIES the habeas corpus petition #1 ; DIRECTS the clerk to enter judgment; and DENIES Donald E. Mudica, III, leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 11/26/19. (Copy mailed to pro se party via certified mail, receipt no. 7018 0360 0001 4183 8620)(ksp)
November 25, 2019 Filing 4 Letter from Donald Mudica (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (nae)
November 18, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Donald E Mudica.(No filing fee of IFP received)(Returned file stamped copy with case number to Mudica) (Attachments: #1 Table of Contents and Argument, #2 Policy 00-02-202, #3 Exhibits A-D, #4 Conclusion, #5 Conduct History, #6 Envelope)(nae)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mudica v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Donald E Mudica, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not yet classified: WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?