Walton v. Gordon et al
Shaun Walton |
Adrianne Gordon, Adianne Gordon, Christopher West, Azari Tatum, Ryan Tinsley, Jordan Hufford and Derek Moore |
3:2019cv01157 |
December 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Jon E DeGuilio |
Michael G Gotsch |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Shaun Walton titled as Motion to Amend Complaint(nae) |
Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; WAIVING initial partial filing fee; ORDERING Plaintiff to pay to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; and DIRECTING the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds and to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 12/13/2019. (Copy mailed to Pro Se and as directed in Order)(mrm) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Shaun Walton. (nae) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Adrianne Gordon, Jordan Hufford, Derek Moore, Azari Tatum, Ryan Tinsley, Christopher West, filed by Shaun Walton. (Returned copy with case number to Walton)(nae) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.