Swift v. Sayulita Fine Foods
| David A Swift |
| Sayulita Fine Foods |
| WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only) |
| 3:2019cv01161 |
| December 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Damon R Leichty |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER VACATING #7 in its entirety; GRANTING #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by David A Swift. ORDERING Plaintiff to immediately pay $15.45 to the clerk in payment of the initial partial filing fee; ORDERING Plaintiff to pay to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; and DIRECTING the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds and to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 2/4/2020. (Copy mailed as directed in Order)(mrm)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: The Court VACATES its February 3 Order #8 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 2/4/2020. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (lhc)
|
|
Filing 8
*VACATED pursuant to #9 * ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk to resend David A. Swift the Court's December 30 Order #5 ; GRANTING Plaintiff until 2/24/2020 to file a signed complaint; and CAUTIONING Plaintiff that, if he does not respond by the deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 2/3/2020. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(bas)
|
|
Filing 7
*VACATED pursuant #10 * ORDER GRANTING #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; The payment of the filing fee is WAIVED. The US Marshals Service is DIRECTED to effect service of process on the defendant. (cc: USM). Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 2/3/2020. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mrm) Modified on 2/5/2020 to vacate per order (mrm).
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by David A Swift from Westville Correctional Facility to Heritage Trail Correctional Facility. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (sent docket sheet)(rmc) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: The Court GRANTS David A. Swift until 1/20/20 to file a signed complaint and CAUTIONS David A. Swift that if he does not respond by the deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 12/30/19. (nal)
|
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT (signed) against Sayulita Fine Foods, filed by David A Swift.(nae) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff David A Swift. (nae) |
| Filing 2 (unsigned) PRO SE COMPLAINT against Sayulita Fine Foods, filed by David A Swift.(nae) |
| Filing 1 Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program by David A Swift. Pursuant to General Order 2018-1, documents submitted to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (nae) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
