Jackson v. Carter et al
| Jerry Jackson |
| Overholser, Dr. Pental, Robert Carter, Jr and Wexford |
| 3:2019cv01176 |
| December 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Philip P Simon |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: Jerry Jackson is GRANTED until 2/27/2020 to resolve his filing fee status, and is CAUTIONED that if he does not respond by the deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 2/7/20. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ksp)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER DISMISSING Scott Speers, Billie J. Minix, Edward Blackburn, and Jerry Jackson; DIRECTING the clerk to open a separate case for Scott Speers, Billie J. Minix, Edward Blackburn, and Jerry Jackson, with the complaint from this case ecf 1 and a copy of this order; and DIRECTING the clerk to directly assign these related, newly opened cases pursuant to N.D. Ind. L.R. 40-1(e). Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 12/19/2019. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(bas)
|
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Robert Carter, Jr, Overholser, Dr. Pental, Wexford, filed by Jerry Jackson. (No fee paid with this filing)(bas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
