Whitener v. Warden
| Michael Devel Whitener and Michael Whitener |
| Warden |
| 3:2019cv01193 |
| December 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Robert L Miller |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed as to Michael Devel Whitener #4 Clerks Judgment and #3 Opinion and Order. (rmf) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (copy mailed to pro se party certified receipt 7099 3400 0003 4511 6893). (shk) |
Filing 3
OPINION AND ORDER: The court DENIES the petition pursuant to Section 2254 Habeas Corpus Rule 4, WAIVES the filing fee, DIRECTS the clerk to enter judgment and to close this case, and DENIES Michael Devel Whitener leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 2/10/2020. (Copy mailed to pro se party certified receipt 7099 3400 0003 4511 6893)(shk)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Petitioner Michael Devel Whitener. (nae) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Michael Devel Whitener. (Returned file stamped copy with case number to Whitener) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(nae) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
