Zuniga v. Warden
Petitioner: Laurentino Zuniga
Respondent: Warden
Not Classified By Court: INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Case Number: 3:2020cv00105
Filed: January 31, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Referring Judge: Damon R Leichty
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2020 ***Amended Pleadings Deadline terminated. (nae)
February 11, 2020 Filing 8 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Laurentino Zuniga.(nae)
February 11, 2020 ***Deficiency Deadline terminated. (rmc)
February 10, 2020 Filing 7 Letter from Laurentino Zuniga regarding payment of filing fee. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (rmc)
February 10, 2020 Filing 6 Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number 3024176 (rmc)
February 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DENYING Laurentino Zuniga #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; DENYING #4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Laurentino Zuniga; GRANTING Laurentino Zuniga until 3/12/2020 to pay the $5 filing fee and file an amended habeas corpus petition on the proper form; and CAUTIONS Laurentino Zuniga if he does not respond by the deadline, this case will be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 2/7/2020. (mrm)
January 31, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel to Pursue Habeas Corpus Proceedings by Petitioner Laurentino Zuniga. (nae)
January 31, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Petitioner Laurentino Zuniga. (nae)
January 31, 2020 Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Laurentino Zuniga. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(nae)
January 31, 2020 Filing 1 Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program by Laurentino Zuniga. Pursuant to General Order 2018-1, documents submitted to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (nae)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zuniga v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Laurentino Zuniga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?