Katz v. Dolgencorp, LLC d/b/a Dollar General
| Larry Katz |
| Dolgencorp, LLC d/b/a Dollar General and Dolgencorp, LLC |
| 3:2020cv00175 |
| February 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Damon R Leichty |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Curtin, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties.. (slm) |
Filing 5
ORDER, Joint Proposed Discovery due by 4/27/2020. Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 5/19/2020 10:45 AM in US District Court - South Bend before Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch Sr.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 4/6/20. (slm)
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Dolgencorp, LLC.(Curtin, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Trevor W Wells on behalf of Dolgencorp, LLC (Wells, Trevor) |
| **NEW CASE** Judge Damon R Leichty and Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (shk) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-4157858.) from St. Joseph Circuit Court, Cause No. 71C01-2001-CT-000027, filed by Dolgencorp, LLC d/b/a Dollar General. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(Curtin, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
