Johnson et al v. Sun & Chang Corporation
| Doris Johnson and Jonathan Johnson |
| Sun & Chang Corporation |
| 3:2020cv00256 |
| March 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
OPINION AND ORDER: The court GRANTS IN PART Sun & Chang's motion for partial summary judgment as to the FLSA claims and DENIES AS MOOT the motion as to the Indiana Wage Payment claims ECF 41 . The court DENIES AS MOOT the motion to amend the co mplaint ECF 31 , the motion for oral argument ECF 37 and the motion to extend discovery ECF 39 . Because federal question jurisdiction no longer exists, the court DISMISSES the remaining state law claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction without prejudice to these claims being pursued in state court. This order terminates the case. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 11/17/21. (nal)
|
|
Filing
30
OPINION AND ORDER: The court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion to dismiss 18 , finding that the court has supplemental jurisdiction over the defamation, conversion, unjust enrichment, and fiduciary duty claims (the latter to the extent it concerns the use of company assets only) in counterclaims 2 and 4-7 and dismissing the remaining counterclaims. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 1/8/2021. (bas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
